Digital media and web chatter provide a great window into how some consumers view the brand, and for this example, Toyota’s brand chatter is off the charts. In his book, The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell helps us predict what the NTSC has known for decades — regulators say it is common for consumer complaints to rise following a major automotive recall.
Toyota has stated that it takes “all customer reports seriously” and it is working to apply “more stringent quality controls, investigate customer complaints more aggressively, keep open lines of communication with safety agencies and respond more quickly to safety issues we identify.”
Frankly, this sounds little flat, impersonal and “after-the-fact” if you ask me. Surely the PR and crisis managers were looking out for their liability in their statements, but this was a time for aggressive, proactive action, demonstrating Toyota’s assertive leadership commitment to safety.
Unfortunately, Toyota was slow. PR gurus say that their response was too little too late, and the consumer “tipping point” had already begun.
What if Toyota had refreshed their website, jumped on Twitter, Linked-In, Facebook and a couple dozen other social media sites and to reinforce who they are, what they value and then backed it up with viral video and leadership action to reinforce their promise of safety? Could they have averted this brand crisis?
Perhaps. With unprecedented access to millions of car owners through social and web media, if Toyota had become proactive, linking its core values to its brand promise using social media, it might have slowed down the speed and trajectory of the crisis at the least, and arguably, prevented deep damage to the brand equity and trust it has earned.
It didn’t do so.
Earning and maintaining trust is about shared values, shared vision, assuming responsibility and always delivering on your promise. Rather than reinforcing its core values and talking about its vision for safe automobiles of the future, it got stuck in reverse. As of the writing of this article, Toyota still hasn’t connected its core values and corporate vision to what consumers value. This is the essence of trust.
A quick look at their website page “Our Values” reveals an animated photo montage of Toyota people with values as a title overlay, but there is no corporate link to a definition of the values that drive the organization forward, nor that help people know that the Toyota promise is one they can depend upon. The only list of Toyota corporate values I could find lies in a dusty website corner promoting the 1984 values that created its joint venture with General Motors in Fremont, California. Talk about dusty.
The issue remains. Can social media and digital media assist during brand and media crises?
Absolutely. But too few organizations understand that trust is not about the product, its features or its benefits, but about the core values and vision of the company behind it, and their living within those values consistently.
Corporate websites beware. Social media and social networking sites mavens take note. These are the media. Trust is always about the truth, shared values and shared vision. Unfortunately, Toyota missed and is still missing the boat.
Hey, Toyota, the world wants to know: What do you really stand for?
Chuck Thomas is President of CTCreative, a strategic marketing and branding consultancy serving market leaders with insight, imagination and integrity. For more information about CTCreative, visit www.ctcreative.com . Start the dialogue. Email at chuck123@ctcreative.com. Copyright 2010 CTCreative, Inc. All rights reserved.
SocialVibe